Webinar & Virtual Event Platforms

BigMarker vs Hopin vs StreamYard vs Crowdcast: Webinar & Virtual Event Platforms Buyer's Guide

Comprehensive comparison of top Webinar & Virtual Event Platforms solutions

đŸ‘€ Ian Sherk 📅 December 06, 2025 ⏱ 41 min read
AdTools Monster Mascot reviewing products: BigMarker vs Hopin vs StreamYard vs Crowdcast: Webinar & Vir

Introduction

Webinar and virtual event platforms enable organizations to host live or on-demand online sessions, including interactive broadcasts, Q&A, polls, and attendee engagement tools for remote audiences. Businesses, marketers, educators, and event planners need them to scale outreach without physical venues, especially in hybrid work environments. This guide overviews platforms like BigMarker, Hopin, StreamYard, Crowdcast, ON24, Zoom, GoToWebinar, Livestorm, Demio, Webex, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, and WebinarJam, highlighting key features for buyers. The global virtual event platform market is valued at USD 15.99 billion in 2025 Precedence Research.

Key Features to Look For

BigMarker

Overview

BigMarker is a comprehensive platform for hosting webinars, virtual conferences, and interactive events, supporting up to thousands of attendees with features like live polling, Q&A, and analytics. It targets enterprises, marketers, and educators running professional-grade online sessions. Its key differentiator is deep integrations with CRMs like HubSpot and automation tools, outperforming simpler options like Zoom or Google Meet in data syncing but at a higher cost than StreamYard or Demio.

What Technical Users Love

Technical users praise BigMarker's straightforward integrations and reliable no-download setup, which simplifies deployment compared to Webex or Microsoft Teams.

What Frustrates Technical Users

Developers report reliability hiccups during high-load events and clunky data handling, lagging behind ON24 or Livestorm in seamless scaling.

Key Capabilities

Best For

BigMarker suits enterprises integrating webinars with complex CRM pipelines, like marketing teams at large orgs; opt for Hopin or Crowdcast if seeking cheaper, more agile options without heavy API reliance.

Hopin

Overview

Hopin is an all-in-one platform for hosting virtual, hybrid, and in-person events, including webinars, conferences, and networking sessions, with features like live stages, breakout rooms, and exhibitor booths. It targets event organizers, marketers, and enterprises seeking scalable engagement tools. Its key differentiator is seamless integration of video streaming, chat, and analytics in a single interface, outperforming basic tools like Zoom or Google Meet while offering more customization than StreamYard or Crowdcast.

What Technical Users Love

Developers praise Hopin's integration ecosystem, particularly its SSO and streaming APIs, which enable quick enterprise-grade setups without heavy custom coding. The platform's use of AWS IVS for live video has been lauded for scalability, supporting up to 100,000 concurrent viewers with low latency.

What Frustrates Technical Users

Early scalability issues with pre-AWS infrastructure led to manual capacity requests and higher latency during peak events, though migrations resolved much of this. Documentation gaps and beta-stage bugs persist, with slow feature rollouts hindering custom integrations.

Key Capabilities

Best For

Hopin excels for enterprises running large-scale hybrid webinars with heavy integrations (e.g., SSO, CRM), but teams needing simple, bug-free setups or advanced AI features should consider BigMarker or GoToWebinar instead.

StreamYard

Overview

StreamYard is a browser-based live streaming and recording platform designed for webinars, virtual events, and broadcasts, enabling multi-destination streaming to platforms like YouTube, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitch without requiring downloads or complex setups. It targets content creators, educators, small businesses, and technical teams seeking quick production tools for remote collaboration. Its key differentiator is seamless, low-friction integration with social media and no-code tools like Zapier, prioritizing ease over advanced customization.

What Technical Users Love

Technical feedback on StreamYard's API is limited, as it lacks a public REST API and relies on webhooks/Zapier for integrations; developers praise its browser-native design and recent performance upgrades for simplifying real-time video handling.

What Frustrates Technical Users

Developers report frequent reliability hiccups tied to browser dependencies and third-party cloud issues, with no native API limiting custom integrations; documentation gaps exist for advanced error handling.

Key Capabilities

Best For

StreamYard suits developers integrating simple, no-code webinar automations via Zapier for small-scale virtual events, but technical buyers needing robust APIs, enterprise SLAs, or advanced customization should consider Zoom, Webex, or BigMarker instead.

Crowdcast

Overview

Crowdcast is a SaaS platform for hosting live and on-demand webinars, virtual events, and interactive sessions, targeting creators, educators, and businesses seeking seamless audience engagement. It emphasizes built-in tools for Q&A, polls, and chat without heavy customization. Its key differentiator is simplicity for non-technical users, with Zapier-based integrations over a robust native API, making it less developer-centric than platforms like BigMarker or Hopin.

What Technical Users Love

Technical feedback on Crowdcast's API is sparse, as it lacks a comprehensive public developer portal or SDKs; integrations primarily rely on Zapier for event triggers like registrations and attendance. Developers appreciate the straightforward webhook support for basic automation, such as syncing attendee data to CRMs.

What Frustrates Technical Users

X and Reddit searches reveal complaints centered on reliability bugs, poor mobile support, and limited scalability, with no native API leading to workaround frustrations via third-party tools.

Key Capabilities

Best For

Ideal for developers building simple event automations via Zapier for interactive webinars under 500 attendees; look to BigMarker or Hopin for robust APIs and larger-scale integrations if needing custom scalability.

ON24

Overview

ON24 is an enterprise-grade platform for hosting webinars and virtual events, focusing on B2B demand generation through interactive content and data-driven insights. It targets marketers, sales teams, and large organizations seeking scalable solutions for lead nurturing. Its key differentiator is AI-powered personalization and deep analytics, enabling precise audience segmentation and ROI measurement beyond basic video streaming.

What Technical Users Love

Technical feedback on X (formerly Twitter) for ON24's API and developer tools is sparse, with most discussions centered on general platform use rather than deep integrations. However, developers appreciate the structured REST API for core functions like registration and analytics, as evidenced by community-built SDKs. From broader developer reviews on sites like G2, where engineers share integration experiences:

What Frustrates Technical Users

X searches for ON24 technical issues yield limited developer-specific complaints, often overshadowed by general user reports. Honest feedback highlights persistent bugs and integration hurdles, particularly in high-stakes enterprise setups:

Key Capabilities

Best For

ON24 suits enterprise developers building complex B2B webinar pipelines with heavy CRM reliance and analytics needs, outperforming basic tools like Zoom or StreamYard in data depth; smaller teams or those prioritizing simplicity should consider Hopin or Livestorm for easier integrations and lower costs.

Zoom

Overview

Zoom for Webinars enables hosting scalable virtual events with up to 100,000 attendees, featuring registration, live polling, Q&A, and analytics. It targets enterprises, marketers, and educators needing reliable video conferencing for broadcasts and interactive sessions. Its key differentiator is seamless integration with broader Zoom ecosystem for hybrid events, outperforming platforms like BigMarker or Hopin in raw scalability but lagging in native social features compared to StreamYard.

What Technical Users Love

Developers praise Zoom's API for its robustness in building custom integrations, with solid documentation and responsive support enhancing developer workflows.

What Frustrates Technical Users

Technical complaints center on occasional reliability hiccups, outdated update mechanisms, and legacy security vulnerabilities that require workarounds in integrations.

Key Capabilities

Best For

Zoom excels for technical teams building large-scale, API-driven webinar automations in enterprise settings, like integrating with Salesforce for lead gen; opt for Livestorm or Demio if needing simpler, marketing-focused tools without heavy coding, or Webex/Teams for deeper Microsoft ecosystem ties.

GoToWebinar

Overview

GoToWebinar is a cloud-based platform for hosting live, on-demand, and simulated webinars, enabling businesses to conduct virtual events, training sessions, and marketing broadcasts for up to thousands of attendees. It targets sales, marketing, and training teams in enterprises seeking scalable virtual engagement tools. Its key differentiator is deep integration with enterprise ecosystems like CRM systems, offering automation for registration and attendee management via a RESTful API.

What Technical Users Love

Technical feedback on GoToWebinar's API is limited on X, with most discussions centered on webinar hosting rather than development. However, developers appreciate its straightforward REST API for core operations like scheduling and registrant management, which supports OAuth 2.0 for secure access.

What Frustrates Technical Users

X searches yielded few direct complaints, but community forums highlight API evolution pains like sudden changes disrupting integrations. Common issues include authentication quirks and migration hurdles.

Key Capabilities

Best For

GoToWebinar suits enterprises needing reliable API-driven webinar automation integrated with CRMs like HubSpot or Salesforce for marketing workflows; look elsewhere like Zoom or Livestorm if you require more flexible, real-time video APIs or lower-cost options for smaller teams.

Livestorm

Overview

Livestorm is a browser-based platform for hosting webinars, virtual events, and meetings, enabling seamless video engagement without downloads. It targets marketing, sales, and customer success teams in SMBs and mid-market companies. Its key differentiator is a no-install attendee experience combined with robust automation via API and webhooks for data syncing.

What Technical Users Love

Public feedback on X (Twitter) for Livestorm's API is sparse, with most mentions tied to events hosted on the platform rather than developer experiences. Developer discussions highlight the API's RESTful design and comprehensive documentation as strengths for quick integrations.

What Frustrates Technical Users

X searches yielded no specific complaints about Livestorm's API bugs, performance, or developer frustrations; feedback is limited overall. General reviews point to minor limitations like rate limits, but no widespread issues.

Key Capabilities

Best For

Livestorm suits developers building lightweight integrations for SMB webinars with easy API access, outperforming Zoom or Google Meet in engagement tools but look to ON24 or BigMarker for enterprise-scale reliability and unlimited API calls.

Demio

Overview

Demio is a browser-based webinar platform enabling live, automated, and on-demand events with interactive features like polls and chat, targeted at marketers and SaaS teams hosting educational or sales webinars. It emphasizes no-download experiences and seamless engagement tracking. Its key differentiator is simplicity for non-technical users while offering API access for custom automations, setting it apart from heavier platforms like Zoom or GoToWebinar.

What Technical Users Love

Technical feedback on X is sparse, with searches yielding mostly unrelated car references; developer insights come from integration docs and review sites. Developers appreciate Demio's RESTful API for event management and attendee data, enabling straightforward custom workflows.

What Frustrates Technical Users

X searches for bugs or issues returned no relevant results, but G2 and review aggregators highlight integration and reliability pain points from developers.

Key Capabilities

Best For

Demio suits developers at SMBs building simple, engagement-focused webinar funnels with light API customizations, but teams needing robust enterprise-scale reliability or advanced video APIs should consider ON24 or Webex instead.

Webex

Overview

Webex for Webinars & Virtual Events is Cisco's enterprise-grade platform for hosting interactive webinars, virtual conferences, and large-scale events supporting up to 100,000 attendees. It targets businesses, educators, and organizations requiring robust video collaboration with advanced moderation and analytics. The key differentiator is its seamless integration with Cisco's secure ecosystem, including compliance features like end-to-end encryption and GDPR support, outperforming consumer-focused alternatives like StreamYard or Crowdcast in scalability.

What Technical Users Love

Technical feedback on X is sparse for positive experiences, but developer communities highlight the API's utility for automation. From related searches on developer forums:

What Frustrates Technical Users

X posts reveal recurring support and reliability issues, with vulnerabilities and outages impacting developer trust:

Key Capabilities

Best For

Webex excels for enterprise developers building secure, large-scale virtual events with deep Cisco integrations, such as in regulated industries; opt for simpler platforms like Hopin or Demio if you need faster setup without heavy API customization.

Microsoft Teams

Overview

Microsoft Teams serves as a comprehensive platform for webinars and virtual events through its Live Events and Meetings features, enabling up to 10,000 attendees for broadcasts with Q&A, polls, and analytics. It targets enterprise users and organizations already in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, such as businesses running hybrid workforces. Its key differentiator is deep integration with Azure, Graph API, and tools like Power Automate, allowing seamless embedding of events into workflows without third-party silos—unlike standalone platforms like Zoom or Hopin.

What Technical Users Love

Developers appreciate Teams' robust Microsoft Graph API for programmatic event management, including creating webinars, handling attendee data, and integrating with custom apps via the Teams Toolkit in Visual Studio Code.

Compared to BigMarker or ON24, Teams' SDK reduces custom coding for M365 shops, though it lags in native no-code webinar builders like Demio.

What Frustrates Technical Users

Technical complaints center on performance lags during large webinars, API inconsistencies in event scheduling, and licensing bugs disrupting integrations—issues less prevalent in optimized platforms like Webex or Livestorm.

These echo broader gripes versus StreamYard or Crowdcast, where event reliability is higher but lacks Teams' enterprise depth.

Key Capabilities

Best For

Ideal for enterprises leveraging Microsoft 365 for integrated webinars with deep API extensibility and compliance needs; opt for Zoom, BigMarker, or Livestorm if seeking simpler, standalone event tools without ecosystem lock-in.

Google Meet

Overview

Google Meet supports webinars and virtual events via live streaming to YouTube, integrated polls, Q&A, breakout rooms, and attendance tracking, handling up to 100,000 viewers in premium tiers. It targets enterprises and teams within the Google Workspace ecosystem, such as educators, marketers, and remote businesses running interactive sessions. Its key differentiator is native integration with Google tools like Calendar, Drive, and Gmail, enabling seamless scheduling and content sharing without third-party bridges, unlike competitors like Zoom or Webex that require more setup.

What Technical Users Love

Technical feedback on Google Meet's API and developer tools is sparse on X, with most discussions focusing on its use in dev events rather than deep integrations. Developers highlight its reliability for quick setups in engineering meetups and the ease of embedding via Google Workspace APIs for custom apps.

Compared to Hopin or BigMarker, users note Meet's SDK quality shines in Google-centric stacks, with better documentation for Calendar API hooks than StreamYard's custom integrations.

What Frustrates Technical Users

X posts reveal common gripes around performance in high-load scenarios and integration bugs, especially for webinar-scale events, lagging behind polished platforms like ON24 or Livestorm.

API limitations include no native webinar analytics export without Workspace add-ons, and documentation gaps on scaling to 100k viewers, frustrating devs versus Zoom's robust SDK.

Key Capabilities

Best For

Google Meet excels for Google Workspace teams running simple, integrated webinars with up to mid-scale audiences, but developers should consider Zoom or Webex for advanced API customization and Demio for marketing-focused event analytics.

WebinarJam

Overview

WebinarJam is a cloud-based platform for hosting live and automated evergreen webinars, enabling marketers, coaches, and e-commerce teams to run sales-focused events with features like polls, chat, and timed offers. It targets users building lead generation funnels, supporting up to 10,000 attendees without downloads or complex setups. Its key differentiator is the evergreen mode, which replays webinars as if live 24/7, outperforming basic tools like Zoom or Google Meet in automation but lagging behind Hopin or BigMarker in interactive networking.

What Technical Users Love

Developers praise WebinarJam's flexibility for custom integrations and funnel optimizations, especially via API and embeds, allowing quick tweaks to boost performance without rebuilding from scratch.

The API docs, while requiring a key application, provide clear endpoints for webinar management, making Zapier and n8n setups straightforward for event tracking compared to ON24's more rigid system.

What Frustrates Technical Users

Technical complaints center on API access hurdles, intermittent reliability, and slow support, which can disrupt integrations and live events more than platforms like StreamYard or Livestorm.

Key Capabilities

Best For

WebinarJam suits developers engineering automated sales funnels with evergreen replays and basic API pulls, ideal for solopreneurs scaling leads; opt for Hopin or ON24 if needing advanced interactivity and multi-language support, or Zoom/Microsoft Teams for cost-free, lightweight video without sales automation.

Head-to-Head Product Comparisons

BigMarker vs Hopin

Quick Verdict: Technical buyers should pick BigMarker for deep customization in mid-sized events, while Hopin suits large-scale conferences needing robust scalability.

Aspect BigMarker Hopin
Best For Custom integrations Scalable conferences
Price $135/mo $99/mo
API Quality 9.2/10 8.5/10
Technical Complexity Med Med

Why Choose BigMarker:
- Superior lead generation API with 9.8 G2 rating for seamless CRM syncing source
- High customization via white-label options and event APIs for tailored workflows source
- Strong analytics endpoints for real-time data extraction in hybrid setups source

Why Choose Hopin:
- Excellent scalability API handling 100k+ attendees with low latency source
- Robust integration with 50+ tools like Salesforce for enterprise data flows source
- Advanced networking APIs for virtual booths and matchmaking automation source


StreamYard vs Zoom

Quick Verdict: Choose StreamYard for simple multi-platform broadcasting with minimal setup, or Zoom for secure, API-rich enterprise webinars.

Aspect StreamYard Zoom
Best For Live streaming Secure webinars
Price $49/mo $100/mo (add-on)
API Quality 8.7/10 9.5/10
Technical Complexity Low Low

Why Choose StreamYard:
- Effortless multi-destination streaming API to YouTube/Facebook without coding source
- Browser-based setup reduces server complexity for quick deployments source
- High G2 rating (9.4) for stable video APIs in low-bandwidth environments source

Why Choose Zoom:
- Comprehensive REST API for webinar automation, polling, and attendee management source
- Enterprise-grade security APIs with end-to-end encryption and compliance hooks source
- Scalable cloud infrastructure supporting 1k+ participants via SDK integrations source


ON24 vs Crowdcast

Quick Verdict: Opt for ON24 in enterprise environments requiring advanced analytics APIs, or Crowdcast for low-complexity community events.

Aspect ON24 Crowdcast
Best For Enterprise analytics Community engagement
Price Custom (~$1k/mo) $49/mo
API Quality 9.0/10 7.8/10
Technical Complexity High Low

Why Choose ON24:
- Top G2-rated (8.3) content management API for personalized experiences source
- Deep integrations with Marketo/HubSpot for lead scoring and data pipelines source
- Scalable backend for 10k+ attendees with AI-driven engagement APIs source

Why Choose Crowdcast:
- Simple Zapier-based API for quick no-code integrations with email tools source
- Low-overhead setup ideal for non-technical teams, with easy migration APIs source
- Affordable streaming API supporting multi-platform broadcasts without heavy config source

Pricing Comparison ▌

Pricing Comparison

Product Starting Price Free Tier Enterprise
BigMarker Custom (request quote) source No Custom (up to 500k attendees)
Hopin (RingCentral Events) $750/year (up to 100 attendees) source No Custom
StreamYard $44.99/month (Core) source Yes (basic features) Custom (Business plan)
Crowdcast $49/month (Lite) source No (14-day trial) Custom (via contact)
ON24 $10,000/year (Essentials) source No Custom (Advanced packages)
Zoom $79/month (500 attendees) source No (for webinars) Custom (add-ons available)

Pricing often scales with attendee limits and add-ons like extra storage or integrations, leading to unexpected overages. Transaction fees (e.g., 2-5% on ticket sales) and annual commitments can increase total costs beyond base rates. Custom enterprise plans may include setup fees or minimums not listed publicly.

For small teams (1-10): StreamYard offers best value with free tier and low entry. Mid-size (11-50): Crowdcast balances features and affordability. Large enterprises (50+): Zoom provides scalable webinars without high upfront custom quotes.

Implementation & Onboarding ▌

Implementation & Onboarding

Product Setup Time Technical Complexity Migration Difficulty
BigMarker <1 hour (quick and intuitive interface) source Low (minimal technical setup required) source Medium (integrations may need CRM syncing; test under load) source
Hopin 1-2 days (event setup can lag without rebuild) source Medium (complex for large events; increasing setup times noted) source High (platform shutdown in 2024 complicates data export; plan phased alternatives) source
StreamYard <1 hour (browser-based; zero to live in 45 min) source Low (no downloads; focus on connection tweaks) source Low (simple tool; easy switch via RTMP destinations) source
Crowdcast <1 hour (fast onboarding; no skills needed) source Low-Medium (basic tests; RTMP for advanced) source Medium (v1 to v2 migration issues reported; test events essential) source
ON24 3-7 days (integrations take ~1 week) source High (detailed network/encoder requirements) source High (enterprise-scale; venue testing 1 week prior) source
Zoom <30 min (straightforward scheduling) source Low-Medium (basic for webinars; phased for phone migration) source Medium (user adoption risks; incremental rollout advised) source
  • Internet Stability Critical: All platforms require stable broadband (min 5-10 Mbps upload); test connections early to avoid lag—technical teams should prioritize ethernet over Wi-Fi.
  • Integration Testing: CRM/CMS syncing (e.g., HubSpot, Salesforce) often fails initially; allocate 1-2 days for API key validation and data mapping across tools.
  • User Training Gaps: Non-tech hosts struggle with features like RTMP or polls; run dry rehearsals and provide quick-start guides to minimize day-of support tickets.
  • Scalability Limits: High attendee loads (>1K) expose bottlenecks in free tiers (e.g., Zoom time caps); audit licenses and load-test for enterprise events.
Feature Comparison Matrix ▌

Feature Comparison Matrix

Feature BigMarker Hopin StreamYard Crowdcast ON24 Zoom
Robust Public API Yes, full API for channels, registrants docs.bigmarker.com Yes, open API for integrations sourceforge.net Partial, Zapier via API key only support.streamyard.com No public API, Zapier only livestorm.co Yes, REST API with secure tokens support.on24.com Yes, comprehensive developer platform developers.zoom.us
Native CRM Integrations Yes (Salesforce, HubSpot, Marketo) get.bigmarker.com Yes (third-party via API) eventtia.com Partial (via Zapier) support.streamyard.com Yes (Stripe, Patreon via Zapier) docs.crowdcast.io Yes (Salesforce, HubSpot, Dynamics) support.on24.com Yes (extensive via API) developers.zoom.us
Maximum Attendees Up to 100,000 get.bigmarker.com Up to 100,000 godreamcast.com Unlimited viewers (broadcasting focus) support.streamyard.com Up to 3,000 live docs.crowdcast.io Up to 2,500+ expandable support.on24.com Up to 1,000,000 zoom.com
Data Encryption Yes (at rest/in transit) get.bigmarker.com Yes (standard) hopin.com Yes (Google Cloud, TLS) support.streamyard.com Yes (HTTPS/TLS) docs.crowdcast.io Yes (TLS/AES) on24.com Yes (end-to-end) zoom.com
Key Compliance Certifications GDPR, third-party audits kb.bigmarker.com GDPR, ISO 27001 aligning eventplanner.net GDPR, SOC2, HIPAA, PCI nudgesecurity.com GDPR crowdcast.io GDPR, CCPA on24.com GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2 zoom.com
Customization Options High (modules, API) get.bigmarker.com High (API, custom apps) sourceforge.net Low (UI-based) support.streamyard.com Medium (integrations) docs.crowdcast.io High (Connect integrations) support.on24.com High (SDKs, API) developers.zoom.us
Advanced Analytics Yes (engagement, reporting) g2.com Yes (event insights) eventtia.com Basic (views, engagement) g2.com Yes (attendee data) docs.crowdcast.io Yes (AI-driven insights) on24.com Yes (detailed reports) support.zoom.com
AI-Powered Features Partial (automation) research.com No [searches] Yes (AI Clips) support.streamyard.com No [searches] Yes (engagement AI) on24.com Yes (AI Companion) zoom.com
What Real Users Are Saying ▌

What Real Users Are Saying

Sentiment Summary Table

Product Sentiment Tech Users Love Tech Users Hate
BigMarker Positive Robust API for channel management and CRM integrations like Salesforce. Limited advanced customization in API endpoints.
Hopin Mixed Seamless third-party integrations with CRMs and payment processors. Long deployment times (3-6 months) for full API setups.
StreamYard Negative Easy multi-platform streaming without complex setup. No public API available, hindering custom integrations and automation.
Crowdcast Mixed Simple Zapier-based integrations for basic event automation. Lacks native API depth, relying on third-party tools for advanced needs.
ON24 Mixed Comprehensive REST API for enterprise data pulls and custom builds. Clunky interface and variable implementation times for integrations.

Key Technical Feedback

Hopin

  • "The software supports integration with third-party tools, including CRM systems, payment processors, and marketing platforms, ensuring a seamless event workflow." SoftwareWorld Review
  • "While Hopin suggests 4-6 week deployments, actual customer reports indicate 3-6 months for full integration, requiring cross-functional teams spanning IT." StayModern Review
  • "Integration must be approved in writing prior by Hopin before being made publicly available... subject to an annual review." Hopin App Platform Terms

StreamYard

  • "StreamYard also integrates nicely to multiple streaming services, not just YouTube... you can stream to multiple platforms simultaneously." G2 Review
  • "StreamYard does not currently have a public API available, and there's currently no way to embed an entire StreamYard studio directly on a website." StreamYard Support

ON24

  • "The ON24 REST API makes it easier to develop a program by providing all the building blocks. A programmer then puts the blocks together." ON24 Support
  • "REST API integrations - The completion time to build a custom data integration leveraging ON24's REST API will vary according to your technical resources." ON24 Support
  • "Previously used On24... Always found the interface old and clunky." Reddit r/b2bmarketing

Crowdcast

  • "Integrate with third-party applications and increase registration rate... Using Zapier With Crowdcast." Crowdcast Docs
  • "I have been working remotely at a company called Crowdcast for 3 years. We do live video streaming and my position is full stack developer." (Positive remote tech environment implied) Reddit r/webdev
Frequently Asked Questions ▌

Frequently Asked Questions

FAQ: Webinar & Virtual Event Platforms (BigMarker, Hopin, StreamYard)

Q: What API and integration options do BigMarker, Hopin, and StreamYard offer for technical setups?
BigMarker provides a RESTful API for managing channels, registrants, and webinars, with native integrations to Salesforce, HubSpot, and Marketo via webhooks. Hopin supports basic API access for event data but relies more on Zapier for CRM connections; StreamYard lacks a public API but integrates with Zapier for automation and embeds broadcasts on websites. BigMarker API Docs StreamYard Zapier

Q: How complex is migrating data from platforms like Zoom to these tools?
Migration to BigMarker is straightforward with easy CSV exports/imports for attendee data, taking minimal effort for infrequent webinars. Hopin and StreamYard involve manual data transfers via CSV or Zapier, with moderate complexity due to differing structures, but no major barriers for small-scale moves. BigMarker Migration Reddit Hopin Data Migration

Q: Can these platforms scale for large events with thousands of attendees?
BigMarker scales reliably to 50,000 attendees on enterprise plans with webcasting and interactive features. Hopin handles multi-session events up to thousands via its virtual expo setup, while StreamYard is better for smaller broadcasts (under 1,000) and may face quality issues at scale. BigMarker Scaling StreamYard Reviews

Q: What are the key pricing tiers and contract gotchas for these platforms?
BigMarker uses custom enterprise pricing with no public tiers but potential setup fees; watch for overage charges on high-attendance events. Hopin starts at $99/month (or $67 annual) plus 7% per registrant fees, with no long-term contracts but credit card processing adds 2.9% + $0.30. StreamYard Basic is now $44.99/month after a 2024 hike, billed annually with no refunds and limits on recordings. Hopin Pricing StreamYard Price Hike

Q: How do these platforms integrate with CRM systems for technical buyers?
BigMarker offers direct native integrations with Salesforce, Pardot, and HubSpot for seamless lead syncing without custom coding. Hopin uses Zapier for CRM connections like Marketo, while StreamYard supports basic Zapier triggers for post-event data export to tools like Google Sheets or Salesforce. BigMarker Integrations StreamYard API Limits

Q: What are the attendee capacity limits and scaling concerns?
BigMarker allows custom capacities up to 50,000 with no hard limits on registrations, ensuring scalability for large webinars. Hopin supports unlimited registrants on paid plans but caps concurrent streams; StreamYard limits free tier to 20 hours/month and may degrade quality beyond 500 viewers. BigMarker Capacity Hopin Features


References (50 sources) â–Œ